Reading Barth Backwards: IV/4, Baptism with Water, #2

Further fuel to add to the parallels between Barth’s reading of Jesus’ baptism and N.T. Wright’s argument for Jesus as a new Israel, formed around himself rather than around ethnic identification with the descendants of Abraham:

In one of the famous small-type passages, Barth writes the following regarding the significance of John the Baptist’s “baptism for repentance” as a way to say that Christian baptism must be at least what John’s baptism was.

“It may be added that the relation of John’s baptism to Jewish proselyte baptism was solidly polemical – a strange connection! – inasmuch as those who according to the Gospels were baptized by John in the Jordan were admonished to submit to the judgment which threatened them as the people of Abraham, and to put their hope solely in the forgiveness of sins which is to be expected as grace from the One who comes to Judge and baptizes with the Spirit. The distinction between New Testament baptism and pre-Christian Jewish baptism is thus as indisputable as their interrelation.” (46).

Thinking about Jesus, then, one could say that Jesus submitted to John’s baptism as a way to submit himself to the judgment that Israel herself had earned so as to ultimately vindicate her.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: